Discuss Love and Passion in relation to either Contemporary Art Assignment

Discuss Love and Passion in relation to either Contemporary Art - Assignment Example The essay "Discuss Love and Passion in relation to either Contemporary Art" explores the Contemporary Art and its connection with Love and Passion. Passion is best described as the rendezvous of the body and the soul. The place where the body’s activity is amalgamated with the soul’s passivity all in intertwine and imposing upon each other. The different make-up of the body allows for the disposition of the passion that exists and gives necessary motion into action. Passion diffuses the spirits which ultimately leads to the realization of passion. When this object of passion becomes the pivotal point then it charges for the union of the senses. Foucault relates on how passion can lead to madness as it at certain degrees transcend beyond a simple cause but through its dominance becomes the foundation of its possibility. These ‘diseases,’ like madness, can then be deemed as an illness of both the soul and the corporeal. In the moralist tradition, madness is d efined in correlation to consternated passion. This chase for the gratification of passions can lead to transient lunacy. Previous thoughts directly associated madness with the notion of passion and desire and its fulfillment. If this is true, then it must mean that when love leads to insanity then that is the ultimate consummation of this fusion gone awry. This manifestation of lurid emotions can often be seen in many artists’ works. The fury and passion of relentless and point blank overbearing love is a subject that is not too uncommon.

ICP- MONROE KELLIEN HYPOTHESIS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

ICP- MONROE KELLIEN HYPOTHESIS - Essay Example Monro-kellie hypothesis refers to the relationships between volume and pressure of ICP, blood, cerebral perfusion pressure and brain tissue in the human skull. The hypothesis proposes that, it is not possible to compress the cranial compartment and that there is always a fixed volume of the cranium cavity (Marmarou et al, 1991). The entire constituents of the cranium and the cranium itself keep a volume equilibrium, which responds directly to any alterations in the cranial cavity. An alteration in the volume of a single cranial component results to changes in the rest of the cranial components. These activities act as compensation for any changes that might compromise the cranial balance. The chief shock absorbers for augmented volumes comprise both blood volume and CSF (Lang & Chesnut, 1995). These shock absorbers react to raises in quantity of the rest of intracranial components. Medical conditions like brain trauma raise the levels of ICP, if ICP goes up it is likely to cause severe brain harm to the brain tissues and cells (Chesnut et al, 1993). Prolonged high levels of ICP can result instantaneous death in adults, but children can withstand such higher pressure for a longer time than the adults without.Severe physical shock in the head can raise the level of ICL can result to cerebral edema and eventually crush the tissue of the brain. Further, such high ICP can dislocate some vital structures of the brain and hinder the movement of blood to the tissues and brain cells. The vertebral canal and cranium and inelastic dura form a non-flexible container that does not stretch or expand in case of increase of the cranial components. Therefore, any increase in cranial blood will result to a direct rise in ICP. Further, another implication of increase in one of the cranial components is that, such an increase will be accommodated by a subsequent decrease in other cranial constituents (Bahram, 2001). This relationship between the cranial